The rainy winter and spring have given way to a beautiful summer. All of a sudden things started getting warm, which means more time outside for Lizzy and I. This also means we have more opportunities to play with gear!

Luke and Lizzy test out the Boulder X on Mt. Rainier

I was excited when I heard La Sportiva was making a new approach shoe, the Boulder X. I had previously used the B5 but it had been too stiff for my liking. The Boulder X, which is meant as a replacement for the Cirque Pro,  features super sticky rubber and a slightly redesigned body. Lizzy and I have been playing with the Boulder X and I have been impressed with the new Idro-Grip sole. Expect a full gear review in a the next months.

Lizzy has been really enjoying the Patagonia Rock Guide Pants and will be reviewing them shortly.

The new Sanuk Base Camp (photo from Sanuk.com)

I’ve been interested in the new Sanuk Base Camp and I just got a pair in for review. I just took them on their first multipitch (as “approach” shoes) and I was psyched at their weight and performance on a steep slab descent. Expect a review coming out once I take them up a few more climbs! Lizzy will also be reviewing the Sanuk Laurel which she took for three weeks of geology in South Africa!

The all new Katana Lace (Photo by LaSportiva.com)

Also in the footwear department, Lizzy and I will be reviewing the new La Sportiva Katana Lace. We both currently use the (original) velcro Katanas and are looking forward to comparing the performance of the new shoe.

Lizzy is all smiles on the hike up to Sugarloaf

Finally, Lizzy has been using the Black Diamond Women’s Innova 50 backpack over the last couple months and will be writing a review considering the pack’s pros and cons for cragging and for more alpine-y adventures.

Let us know if you have any gear questions!

- Luke

For past Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

Don't ask why my fingers are pointing different directions... Instead enjoy the view of Mount Rainer.

I always have too much stuff. I guess it’s because I like to tinker with things and climbing gear just tends to appeal to me. This does not always work out when I try to bring to whole kitchen sink to the crag with me. I want to have two pairs of climbing shoes, maybe an extra jacket and a trusty pair of crag sandals or Sanuks plus rope, cams, etc.

Looking at the Black Diamond Nitro I was unsure how I could manage to bring my plethora of climbing “accessories” to the crag with me. For the first many months I just avoided the problem entirely and used the Nitro as a day pack. The Nitro came to the climbing gym with me twice a week for about 5 months and worked perfectly to hold a harness, chalk bag and two or three pairs of climbing shoes. I have the Nitro in a size Medium, which has a volume of 22 L (1,340 cu in) and weighs in at 940 g (2 lb 1 oz).

One of the first improvements I noticed was the external mesh pockets. The grey mesh actually stretches enough to fit a one Liter bottle when the pack is fully loaded. On older BD packs like the RPM, you cannot fit anything in the external pockets when the pack was stuffed to the brim. Having pockets that allow you to bring even more stuff, and are easily accessible, is a big plus!

In addition to the two external water bottle pockets, the Nitro is hydration compatible and the internal sleeve sits against the solid back sheet. This molded plastic panel provides the stability for the pack and I was impressed with the amount support this had for a day pack. There is a place for a Camelbak or equivalent hose to come out of the top of the pack but no clip or strap on the shoulder straps to keep the hose from flying around.

The waist-belt uses a floating buckle that allows the user to really cinch it down and offers a wide range of sizes. The right side of the belt has a nice zippered pouch that works well for cliff bars, chap stick, or a watch. Since the pack has no lid, there is a small zippered pouch on the front panel with a key loop. I usually keep my cell phone and a headlamp in here.

Awesome external pocket is perfect for a pair of shoes!

One interesting feature is an exterior kangaroo pocket with a pair of compression straps. At first I had no idea what to put in it but have come to use it constantly. It is perfect for a pair of sandals, or you can stuff in a jacket or a pair of sweaty climbing shoes. I always have something shoved in there when I take the Nitro to the gym or the crag, making this my favorite feature of the pack.

The “compression” straps above the front pocket do not reduce the size of the pack but are functional for attaching a rope or securing clothing such as a down jacket. When I eventually took the Nitro cragging, I was surprised that I could fit a harness, a set of draws, a few pairs of shoes, water bottle and lunch inside a sub-30 Liter pack. I had to strap the rope on the outside, but it was very functional for a light day of cragging.

One of the main features of the Nitro is the ReActiv suspension which allows the pack to move with you as you walk. The shoulder straps are connected at bottom of the pack with a wire that runs through the back sheet. The waist belt also has a bit of side-to-side mobility. I could really feel the advantage of the suspension when I had the Nitro fully loaded. When I was hiking on talus or moving on uneven terrain, the pack would stay centered by moving with my body. This was a really cool feeling and showed me that the technology worked as designed.

The special reActiv suspension and back panel (photo from Black Diamond)

The only thing that I would like is a load lifting system, although the pack is probably too small for that to work. Strapping too much weight to the Nitro causes it to put a lot of weight on the shoulder straps. A taller pack might help address this issue, but I’m not sure if this would be possible without eliminating the benefits that come with a smaller day pack.

I really enjoyed the Nitro and commend Black Diamond on the innovative suspension. This is a great size for a day pack and can work in a pinch as a small crag pack if you only have to carry the rope or the rack. The exterior pockets are super convenient and I hope Black Diamond starts using the extra stretchy grey mesh on more of their packs.

Pros:

  • External kangaroo pocket is always useful
  • Mesh pockets are very stretchy and can easily fit a 1 Liter water bottle.
  • reActiv suspension moves with your body and makes loads seem lighter.

Cons:

  • Missing a keeper loop or clip on the shoulder straps for a hydration hose.
  • An internal zippered pocket or a larger top pocket would have been nice.

Enjoy,

Luke

Full Disclosure: Black Diamond provided this backpack to DreamInVertical in exchange for this review. The opinions expressed above are my own and reflect my experience with this backpack.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the Nitro backpack.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

In my mind a good backpack carries well, is easily filled with gear, and is durable enough to stand up to abuse. In recent years I have seen many climbers bring small haul bags or haul packs as a substitute for a crag pack. These packs are usually spacious and quite durable. However, most haul bags lack simple features like a lid or a good suspension. Black Diamond has attempted to combine the best of both worlds and created the 50 Caliber pack.

The first thing I realized when I got my hands on the 50 Caliber is the HUGE capacity.  I have a medium, which at a weight of 3 lb 6 oz holds 52 L (3,175 cubic inches) – Stats from BD. This pack is currently my biggest non-backpacking pack and it really swallows gear. Over the summer I was so happy with it that I chose to bring it on a few overnight trips instead of my typical backpacking pack.

Looking out at the Conness lakes. (Notice the removed lid)

In my mind the 50 Caliber is designed for cragging at places like Indian Creek, where you need to bring a rope and an extravagant amount of cams and many other essentials. During our trip to IC over Thanksgiving I could easily fit a 70m rope inside the pack in addition to 30+ cams, two water bottles, a few pairs of shoes, and my harness. If it was cold, I could extend the collar and stuff my down jacket under the lid. This made the pack quite tall, but it still carried well. When you pack the 50 Caliber to the brim you might need a place for your helmet and Black Diamond comes through with their mesh lid cover previously seen on the Jackal and other packs. This holds the helmet on well and you can even stick a Nalgene under your helmet if you are short on space (unlikely).

Fully loaded for a few nights in the Sierra backcountry!

Over the summer on one occasion I was out in the backcountry and needed to climb with my pack. I was able to strip the Caliber down by removing the lid and tightening the waist strap around the back. I climbed 5 pitches, swapping leads, wearing the pack. It wasn’t nearly as comfortable as a small summit pack but proved that it could still perform on route, a task well outside the intended purpose.

As I mentioned, I took the 50 Caliber backpacking and I was able to secure my sleeping pad on the outside via the compression straps. Yet again the Caliber stepped outside its intended use and functioned well during the weekend. It would have been easier to attach gear to the outside of the pack if both straps had snap buckles. The current model only has a snap buckle on the upper strap. In most cases this is no big deal, but should be duly noted.

Climbing with the 50 Caliber on Mt. Langley

Since the 50 Caliber is designed as a crag pack, Black Diamond decided to make the bottom as durable as possible by making it out of haul bag material. An additional benefit of this stiff fabric is that the Caliber stands up on its own, which really helps for packing. In places like Red Rocks, where you do a lot of scrambling, or Joshua Tree, with all the sharp granite, the bottom of the pack is often the first thing to go. Lizzy’s favorite pack, an older BD Sphynx, has multiple layers of duct tape keeping the bottom together. One of my packs from REI has a similar issue. I doubt the 50 Caliber will suffer the same fate.

A bit of scrambling at dawn.

The shape of the 50 Caliber is simple. The only compartment is a tube with a few compression straps and two external clipping points for water bottles, etc. The benefit of this shape is that gear stuffs inside easily and the Caliber ends up with a minimal amount of dead space. There is a stowable piece of webbing for attaching the rope under the lid. I like to pack my rope in the bottom of the pack so I haven’t used this feature. I do appreciate that it packs into a small pouch and hasn’t been flapping around like on older BD models. The 50 Caliber has standard ice ax loops on the bottom but doesn’t have an obvious way of securing the shaft to the top of the pack. Perhaps a piece of Velcro could be added to attach the shaft to the clip in points on the back of the pack.

As I mentioned before, the lid is removable since it is connected via four pieces of webbing. This allows the lid to float when you need to use the extendable collar of the pack. Another nice feature is that you can extend the webbing and tuck the lid inside the collar to make the pack much shorter and more compact when you still want to have a lid but are not carrying a full load. I appreciate this since the pack carries better and the lid does not flop around when the pack is not full. The lid has both top and bottom pockets with an internal mesh pocket inside the bottom that will fit a phone, keys of something similar. The top has a mesh keeper flap for your helmet, which may look goofy but is functional.

Enjoying the hike in to Mt. Conness.

I’ve hiked anywhere between 15 minutes and 4 hours wearing the Caliber. The best part of the suspension in my opinion is the cushy waist belt. The 3+ inches of foam do a great job putting the majority of the weight on one’s hips. The shoulder straps are not quite as cushy and occasionally dug into my shoulders. A bit of adjusting usually makes the discomfort go away, but I think they could be improved. I prefer a more rectangular strap that distributes the weight across the width of the webbing, whereas the shoulder straps on the Caliber seemed to focus the weight to the inside. Lizzy suggested that I might need a size small since a different fit could change the way the load is distrubted across the shoulder strap. So I would add that it is important to try out the Caliber to make sure the shoulder straps fit.

Overall I have been very happy with the pack and would recommend it when you need to haul a lot of gear to the crag. I wouldn’t be surprised if they make a smaller version since the haul bag bottom really is a great feature!

Pro’s:
  • Lid is removable and has helmet mesh.
  • Bottom of pack is very durable.
  • Waist belt is very comfortable and is quite adjustable.
  • Pack compresses well.
  • Very spacious and fits gear well.

Con’s:

  • Shoulder straps could be shaped to fit better.
  • Load lifters are not very effective.

Enjoy,

Luke

Full Disclosure: Black Diamond provided this backpack to DreamInVertical in exchange for this review. The opinions expressed above are my own and reflect my experience with this backpack.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the 50 Caliber backpack.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

In 2008 Arc’teryx was first to market with a new way of building a climbing harness. Petzl had developed a similar technology with the Frame Harness, but it did not offer the weight savings present by the Arc’teryx’s Warp Technology. A few months after the release of the R320 and companion models, I heard a rumor that Black Diamond was developing a lightweight harness with similar technology.  I am a fan of most Black Diamond products and had to wait until this new harness came out before I committed to getting a new harness.

Belay duty is pretty hard work in Indian Creek.

Finally in May of 2009 the Chaos harness was available and I eagerly went to REI to check it out.  I did a in store comparison with the Arc’teryx R320 and chose the harness with the larger gear loops, the R320. You can see my review of the R320 here. Fast forward to September of 2009 and I was still curious to look at the Chaos and was presented with the opportunity to do a review.

The Kinetic Core Construction used in the Chaos

I immediately put the Chaos to lots of use with several trips to Yosemite, climbing the Free Blast, and then climbing it again to continue up the Salathe Wall to the Ear (about 17 pitches).  Next I wore the Chaos on the 14 pitch Original Route on Rainbow Wall in Red Rocks where it performed beautifully. Over Thanksgiving, the Chaos was the only harness I brought to Indian Creek for seven days of cragging.  To finish out 2009, the Chaos accompanied me up Levitation 29 in Red Rocks and the first 9 pitches of the Nose on El Capitan.  Since I wanted to offer a good comparison in this review, I took a few opportunities to wear my R320 during this time, including climbing Freerider.

Luke on the Mammoth Terraces of El Capitan.

Out of the box I had immediately liked the R320 because it was super light and fit well. The Chaos, however, dug into my waist on my first multi-pitch climbs in Yosemite. This made me wonder if the Kinetic Core Construction really worked. The stiff waist band did not flex to fit my contours and was uncomfortable during long belays. The R320, right out of the box, formed more of a curve and felt much better on my waist. After wearing the Chaos for a month or so, the waist belt broke in and started being more and more comfortable. I could no longer feel the stiff waist belt digging into my sides during hanging belays and long hang-dogging sessions. The fabric of the Chaos waistband, which is a bit taller and more substantial than the R320, takes a bit of time to break in but becomes equally comfortable.

From the specs you know this harness is pretty light at 14 ounces though not as tiny as the 11.4 ounces of the R320. I think it is important for trad climbers to be able to carry a full rack of gear comfortably. This is one of the ways that the Chaos is superior to the R320. Since waist belt is a bit taller and more importantly stiffer it does not sag at all when loaded with a double set of cams or more. The super thin fabric of the R320 suffers when fully loaded and it feels like the waist band wants to slip off. Without gear, however, the R320 is barely noticeable, such that I’ve even forgotten to take it off.

Luke takes a burn on Hidden Arch, Joshua Tree

The R320 and Chaos have similar features. Fixed leg loops, a haul loop and four gear loops. Both harnesses have speed buckles that allow for fast on and off.  The details of these features vary.  The gear loops on the R320 are large and directional (gear slides forward or back) but floppy. The Chaos has much stiffer gear loops that are nice to clip gear to but are almost 25% smaller.  The style of the webbing on the Chaos is much more coarse than the R320. On the Arc’teryx harness the webbing would slip through a bit during a day of climbing, requiring me to constantly tighten it. The webbing on the Chaos holds the harness closed and I haven’t had to re adjust it while climbing.

Black Diamond makes a few other harnesses with  Kinetic Core Construction, called the Aura and the Ozone. These sport climbing specific harnesses feature two gear loops but each loop is much larger than the loop on the Chaos. A combination of one large and one small gear loop per side would have been much better in my opinion since I would like to have more space on the gear loops of the Chaos.

Luke gets ready to climb in Joshua Tree

Due to the smaller gear loops I changed my racking from gate facing in (my preference) to gate facing out (which racks better on the Chaos). When I first tried to rack up a double set of cams and quickdraws for the Free Blast I couldn’t fit everything with the gates facing in. This may not be an issue for those who use gear slings but I prefer to rack all of my gear on my harness unless climbing a chimney or an long route with many belay change overs.

I got used to the gate facing out method of racking but noticed that it led to another small concern. Occasionally when removing biners from the gear loop, a notched nose would catch on the plastic tubing. I use wiregate biners for my cams, mainly BD OZ’s, and this may be part of the problem. This is not a big deal but just something that I don’t remember happening on any of my other harnesses.

Luke laybacks his way up Pit Bull Terror. Photo by Andre Kiryanov

In its second weekend of use the Chaos went up on El Capitan and suffered though my lead of the Hollow Flake. With 80+ foot fall potential you want to be securely wedged in the squeeze chimney.  This continuous wedging and wiggling of my hips, and thus my harness, put a small hold in the Chaos at the connection point of the front gear loop. Luckily, and likely due to good construction, this hole has not cause me any problems in the following six months of use.

The only other problem I have had with the Chaos is the fabric on my left leg loop had started to peel back, which I noticed in December. The stitching had worn off and the lightweight fabric had opened up. This is not a functional or safety problem but more of an aesthetic complaint. I am pretty sure this is due to aggressive leg jamming on offwidths which happened both in Yosemite and during my week at Indian Creek.

Luke enjoys Wavy Gravy in Indian Creek

A few people will find the fixed leg loops of the Chaos to be a problem. Black Diamond does offer a KCC harness with adjustable leg loops called the Xenos. This harness is geared towards ice climbing with many ice clipper loops. I find the fixed leg loops to be comfortable and I had no problem climbing the Nose wearing long underwear and lightweight softshell pants in December. I don’t ice climb or mountaineer so I don’t have the need to put on too many layers on my lower body. If you expect to be using lots of ice screws and climbing in cold climates the Xenos might be the ticket.

Compared to the R320, the haul loop on the Chaos is more durable and in a better orientation. When a carabiner is clipped to the haul loop it is allowed to lay flat, which creates a lower profile. This design is not perfect since the biner still rubs behind you so I would often relocate the haul line when chimneying. Having the haul line snag is not a real complaint since it could happen with almost any harness.

In the end the R320 and Chaos have different features and benefits. The most important thing with a harness is fit and the ratio of waist band to leg loop size varies between these harnesses. I have been happy wearing both harnesses on all day climbs, which in my mind puts them to the comfort test. Both sets of gear loops have disadvantages and I can hope that the next generation will show some improvements. In terms of durability, I have been really impressed with the R320 since it has shown less wear than the Chaos. Only time will tell if they will continue to age at the same rate.

I’d love to hear some other opinions if there are things that I have missed. If you have any questions feel free to leave a comment.

Sizing:

For reference I wear a size Medium in both the R320 and the Chaos. I am about a 31 or 32 in men’s pants and am 5′ 8″ and 155 pounds. I have to tighten the R320 as much as possible to get it small enough to stay on. The Chaos adjusts smaller so I don’t have to tighten it quite as much.

Pros:

  • Comfortable once broken in.
  • Full strength haul loop
  • Waist belt does not sag with a full rack on.
  • Very durable webbing in speed buckle does not slip.

Cons:

  • Small Gear loops
  • Light-weight material lacks durability

Full Disclosure: Black Diamond provided this harness to DreamInVertival in exchange for this review.  The opinions expressed above are my own and reflect my experience with this harness.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the Chaos.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

I don’t really consider myself to be a boulderer. Sure, I boulder occasionally, especially during the winter when weather is unpredictable, but at heart I really love to climb cracks. However, there’s a limit to how much better one can get at crack climbing without cross-training. The winter is a great time to cross train, since the weather in Yosemite is not so perfect. I’ve been cross-training endurance by sport climbing, but I think it’s better to train power by bouldering, which is what I’ve been doing the past couple weeks. And helping me with all this bouldering is the newest pair of shoes in my quiver: the La Sportiva Speedsters.

Several things about the Speedster are very different from the other climbing shoes I’m used to wearing (mostly Miuras(trad) and Katanas (sport)), but the Speedster definitely has many features that make them excel at bouldering, even compared to the Miura VS (review here).

Check out the rubber on the toe!

Since these shoes are pretty new, many of you may not have had a chance to check them out in person yet, so now we’ll go on a little tour of the Speedsters:

Putting on my Speedsters.

The Speedster is an aggressive, yet ultra sensitive bouldering slipper. It shares the same P3 platform that the Miura VS and Solutions have, but pairs them with 3mm Vibram XS Grip2 rubber, which gives them a way more sensitive feel than the Miura VS. Although I’m used to stiffer shoes, this sensitivity is pretty amazing – you can really feel the holds you’re standing on. Or toe-hooking, because the rubber actually wraps over the front of the toe and onto the upper part of the shoe (see the 2nd picture in this blog).

Adjusting my toes in the front of the Speedster.

I have to admit, I haven’t exactly used the Speedsters extensively yet. They really need to be quite tight to take advantage of the aggressive shape and sensitivity, so they’re really not route climbing shoes (maybe for really short, steep, powerful sport routes, but those aren’t exactly my thing). They’ve been great for bouldering in the gym because they really allow you to pull yourself in with your toes even on the smallest little foot jib on a steep angle.

I also took them out to play in Bishop, with mixed results. I tend to gravitate towards boulder problems that are balance-y and not particularly steep, which, it turns out, is maybe not the best use of the Speedsters. On the pockets and small edges of the Happy and Sad boulders, I felt way more comfortable and solid wearing the Miura VS than the Speedsters, which may be because I am more standing on my feet (i.e. vertical climbing) than pulling in with them (steep climbing). On the other hand, the Speedsters do toehook and heelhook really well.

Working on Molly (V5) in the Speedsters.

So, now on to some practical issues – fit and longevity of the shoe.

The first pair of Speedsters I tried were 34.5 and it was a serious struggle to get them on my feet, although it was possible. I decided to go with 35 instead, which are still extremely tight and a little challenging to put on, although they’re definitely relaxing a bit over time. This is the same size that I wear my Miura VS or Testarossa (35) and half a size bigger than I wear  my Katanas(34.5).  I’d recommend trying to size them pretty tight because you’ll be wasting all that downturned, sensitive goodness if you wear them in a “comfy” size. These are not meant to be your comfy slippers. It usually takes me a little bit of adjusting to get the Speedsters on my feet, and I only put them on after my feet are warmed up, or else my feet might cramp up.

In terms of longevity, I haven’t gone through the rubber too much yet, since these aren’t my all-around shoes. Like most slippers, they probably won’t be quite the same after a resole, which is particularly complicated here due to the way the rubber actually wraps up and around the toe. They also use 3mm rubber, which I don’t think all resolers even stock. However, if you just use the shoes when you need to, they’ll probably last a reasonably long time.

Luke takes advantage of the Speedsters’ excellent performance on the steep roof of Therapy.

So, what is the bottom line?

The Speedsters are not my go-to, does-everything shoe (that would be the Miuras). I would not recommend them as a primary climbing shoe unless you really only like steep bouldering – they are fantastic at toeing-in on the steeps, but not so good for thin edges or pockets or smears. However, these are a great addition to your shoe quiver, especially if you tend to always wear stiff edging shoes like I do.

Lizzy

Here are a few comments from Luke:

As more of a boulderer than Lizzy I was very excited when she got the speedster. So much so that I went out and got a pair. My main experiences with slippers comes from the La Sportiva Cobra and the 5.10 Moccasym. Neither shoe has a solid heel and I was very impressed with how well the Speedster heel hooked. It does very well with directional heels but the back of the shoe can start peeling off your foot when hooking more aggressively on protrusions. I sized these super tight and they took a week or two to to fit better. They have little to no dead space for me which is amazing. I sized the same as the cobra (38 for me) which provided a much much tighter fit. This is the same as my tight pair of Katanas and a half size smaller than a moderately comfy pair of Miura lace ups (38.5).

As Lizzy mentioned these are not an edging shoe but work really well indoors and on steep terrain. It is very cool to be able to really feel the foot holds under your toes. They are a very specialized shoe but can be a great addition to a quiver of shoes.

Full Disclosure: La Sportiva provided these shoes to Lizzy in exchange for this review.  Luke purchased a pair separately. The opinions expressed above are those of the reviewers and reflect our experience with these shoes.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the Speedster.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

Although most of the sweet gear I get is for climbing or running or cycling, there is some awesome gear that I use for my during-the-week life. I know that most climbers out there are like me: we have a “normal” job during the week to help support our climbing habit on weeknights, weekends, and vacations. Many of you probably commute to work in some way, and you might even have a laptop that you commute with, like I do.

Well, if you’re looking for a great solution for organizing your stuff and transporting your laptop to and from work or school, the Patagonia Crosstown backpack is a great choice.

Patagonia Crosstown backpack. Photo from Patagonia.com

For the last many years, including my entire time at Caltech, I used a Timbuk2 bag as my school bag. Although there are some great reasons to use a Timbuk2 bag (they’re awesome, and generally very compatible with getting around by bike), they are not really the best commuting bags, in my opinion, especially if you’re carrying a laptop back and forth. The fact is that the bag is only ever on one shoulder and, well, it doesn’t feel good on your shoulder. So, when I knew I would be carrying my computer to and from the office every day at Stanford, it was time for an upgrade (my parents offered to get me a new backpack as a graduation gift).

I chose the Patagonia Crosstown backpack because it seemed to have a great combination of features, functionality, and style, and that has definitely proven to be true.

Here’s a rundown of the features I love:

  • Laptop sleeve is perfect for my 13″ laptop, and easy to get my laptop in and out even when the main compartment is pretty full.
  • Plenty of room for notebooks, textbooks, lunch, extra jacket, etc. in the main pocket, plus a little internal mesh pouch that’s perfect for my calculator and mouse.

Main compartment, showing laptop sleeve and internal mesh pouch.

  • Just the right amount of organization in the front compartment – my favorite pencil, my favorite pen, my cell phone, and my ZuneHD. Everything a girl needs :)   Plus room for my wallet and other small necessities.

Front organizer compartment

  • External mesh water bottle pouch. Because it’s good to stay hydrated.
  • Zippered side pouch. It fits my keys and the “coffee shop” covers for my bike shoe cleats. It is really awesome to arrive at my office or my apartment and not have to take my backpack off to access my keys. I don’t think I can ever be happy with a bag that doesn’t have this feature from now on…

Zippered side pouch (perfect for keys!)

  • The front sleeve is PERFECT for my Chaco Flips, which I wear approximately 350 days a year, including most school days. Since I wear bike shoes to ride my bike, it’s great to be able to easily throw my flip flops into my backpack.
  • Comfortable suspension. To be fair, I don’t have a very long “commute” – 5-6 minute bike ride or a ~20 minute walk – and I have a very light laptop, but I’ve taken the backpack (full of stuff) through airports, too and it’s generally very comfortable.
  • Durable fabric that does a good job of staying clean. I don’t have a rear fender on my bike, so when it’s wet, the spray from the back wheel gets on me and my backpack. But you couldn’t tell from looking at my backpack – the dirt brushes right off.
  • Environmentally friendly: the backpack is made from 100% recycled polyester (except for the lining and mesh).

Flip flop sleeve!

There are a few minor issues I’ve had with the backpack:

  • The shoulder straps have a tendency to loosen – I feel like I have to re-tighten them fairly often. This may be due to the amount of on and off I subject my backpack to – I’ve never had a problem with it loosening while I’m riding my bike.
  • The waistbelt also seems to spontaneously loosen, even though I never use it (just keep it clipped closed so it’s out the way). This could be kind of annoying if you use the waistbelt on a regular basis (I don’t).
  • It might be tricky to fit a large laptop into the pouch, although if you have a computer that big, you’re probably not carrying it to work/school every day.

So, to sum up my thoughts: this is a really great backpack, especially for my (short) commute. It has great tools for organizing my stuff, without going overboard, as it seems many backpacks do these days. And there are many really thoughtful, awesome features like the zippered side key pouch and the front (flip-flop) sleeve.

Lizzy

Back when I was learning to lead belay (and climb multipitch routes), one of my guides told my classmates and I that we needed to go get daisy chains and belay gloves before he’d let us lead belay: a daisy chain so that you can attach yourself to an anchor (although now I typically anchor with a clove hitch on the dynamic rope and have my daisy as backup) and gloves to make you more likely to catch a long fall when the force could otherwise start ripping the skin on your palms (yes, the thought of that makes me cringe, too).

The belay gloves are especially relevant for someone like me, who has small hands and often belays someone heavier than myself and I’ve continued wearing them most of the time. I’ve found that they help me when I’m dealing with the extra friction when top-belaying with my Reverso, and they help keep my hands a little more rope-grime-free (because when my hands get all rope-grime-y, I’m even more likely to accidentally get rope grime all over my face).

So over the past ~6 years I’ve gone through 2 pairs of Metolius Climbing Gloves, which are leather 3/4 finger belay gloves (I wear an XS). I’ve been pretty happy with them, except for the fact that sometimes the internal seams can really rub on the backs of my fingers (non-ideal when the cracks you’re climbing are doing that too).

I recently received a pair of the new Black Diamond Stone Gloves, which are also leather 3/4 finger gloves (again, I wear an XS in these also). I’ve been using them for the past couple of weekends doing short multipitches and cragging and overall I’m very happy with them, although there are a couple small issues you may want to consider, depending on what you plan to use your gloves for.

Black Diamond Stone gloves in black (photo from Backcountry.com)

When I first put the gloves on, I noticed that they already felt nice. My previous gloves have always been a bit stiff at first (which makes the whole seam-rubbing-on-fingers problem worse), but these were good right away. They fit me a little tighter than my Metolius gloves, but the Metolius ones were always a tad big anyways. I have the gloves in black, but they also come in tan. The black has been nice in this cooler weather, but for warm weather uses I imagine the tan might be preferable.

The 3/4 finger length gave me good dexterity (a lot of full-finger gloves are too long for my small girly fingers), while still providing my hands with some warmth (which is another reason I like to have gloves with me). The gloves have a nice big (yet fairly low-profile) velcro strap to help with the on/off. They have worked just fine for standard belaying and rappelling and I don’t see any reason to switch back. The gloves are very well made and I think may be lighter than my previous gloves, which are both nice features.

Here’s how the gloves look on my hands. Note how the leather doesn’t really cover 3/4 of my fingers…

There were a couple of small issues:

  • The fingers are not quite as long as the fingers on my Metolius gloves. This means you have to try a little harder to keep the rope in your palm and not rubbing against your fingers – so these may not be the ideal gloves for aid climbing, where you have a lot of rope-pulling to do.
  • As you can see in the picture, there are holes in the straps. I assumed these were loops to clip in to when I want to put my gloves on my harness. So far they haven’t been as well suited to this purpose as the loops on my Metolius gloves. I also discovered some small loops on the inside of the glove that I guess you could thread a small loop of accessory cord through to make your own clip-in loops, but I still don’t know how well this would work. Basically the main annoyance is that the two gloves don’t sit in quite as low-profile a manner as I’m used to when they’re on my harness.

Overall, I’d say these are great for most cragging and multipitch uses. The gloves are well-constructed, reasonably lightweight, comfortable, and easy to get on/off. For any routes that could involve more hauling and aiding, I’d probably recommend going with something a little more heavy duty and with longer fingers.

Any thoughts about other brands or styles of belay gloves?

Lizzy

Full Disclosure: Black Diamond provided these gloves to DreamInVertical in exchange for this review. The opinions expressed above are my own and reflect my experience with these gloves.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

After testing out the Acrteryx R320 I was interested in trying out the competition. Right now I am testing the Black Diamond Chaos with the Kinetic Core Construction. So far I’ve mainly been cragging but it went up the Freeblast twice back in October. After a bunch more pitches I will be doing a full review with a comparison against the R320.

DSC01283

The BD Chaos fully loaded on Hidden Arch in Joshua Tree

I just bought a pair of La Sportiva Speedsters so I will be contributing to Lizzy’s review so we can get a dual perspective on this new soft soled slipper. Expect this in the next two months after Lizzy and I have a chance to go bouldering on real rock.

Lizzy and I have been climbing multipitches for a while and have found that in some situations hauling the pack can be ideal for the follower. After putting holes in many of our packs we have recently switched to using the Metolius Haul Packs when we want to haul.

El Cap trip 2 - 169

A mess of gear and the yellow Metolius Shield Haul Pack

On the Original Route on Rainbow Wall I hauled a Zodiac pack, 15L, and on El Captain we used the Shield, 31 L, as a sub bag. These bags still look great after 10 and 22 pitches of hauling respectively. After a few more trips I plan on publishing a review and a few hauling tips.

Also I  think it would be nice to provided a summary of the summit/ follower packs that Lizzy and I have used. My current favorite is the Black Diamond RPM which is a bit on the large size (26L) but compacts easily and holds weight really well.

El Cap - Oct 09 054 - edit2

Walking across the Mammoth Terraces on El Captain with the Black Diamond RPM pack.

After much searching and frustration with outdoor clothing companies, Lizzy has finally found a pair of non-cotton, non-yoga-style climbing pants that fit her in addition to providing sun and bug protection. After a few months of testing for durability Lizzy will be writing a review of the Columbia Womens’ Trekster pants. Also, Lizzy has been using the new Black Diamond Stone gloves and should have a review of them out shortly.

I have a pair of the Black Diamond N-Force Ascenders and will be doing a comparison with the Petzl Ascension.  After using the BD ascenders 4 days straight on Freerider I have a good idea about what I like and what doesn’t work.


El Cap trip 2 - 030

N-Force in hand, ready for El Captain!

For other Sweet Gear reviews make sure to check out the Gear Reviews page.

Cheers,

Luke

Tommy Caldwell is an inspiration, a bad ass and one of the most talented all around climbers in the world.  When I heard Sportiva was coming out with the TC Pro I wanted in. I’ve been a Miura junkie for a while but was curious about what the TC Pro had to offer. I dream of doing many long free routes and thought these shoes might offer an all day solution.

So far I’ve worn the TC Pros for more than twenty days which has racked up over 100 pitches of climbing. This ranges from the first day wearing the shoes at the gym, a pair of multi-pitch first ascents in the Tuttle Creek / Lone Pine Peak region  to climbing El Capitan. I’ve climbed from 5.6 slab to 5.12 face and all grades and styles in between. I’ve been climbing mainly on granite but the type of granite ranges from the the alpine rock of Mount Langley and Mount Conness, to Tahquitz, Joshua Tree  and Yosemite.

P8212109

Standing on nothing in Pine Creek Canyon

These shoes are marked as all around performers and I would have to agree. The first weekend climbing the TC Pro’s went to Pine Creek near Bishop for a bunch of fun sport climbs. I had taken them on a short crack climbing trip to San Diego’s Mt. Woodson but nothing serious. On their first lead climb, I was unfamiliar with such a stiff sole and didn’t know how to use them. Over the day, I found they could stand on very small edges which resulted in an onsight of Stone Cold Fusion, seen above. This was one of my hardest onsights of the last few months and the new shoes clearly did not hold me back.

Many of the sport routes on the Mustache Wall follow flaring cracks, un-protectable by trad gear, with sections of face climbing. In these flares the TC Pro’s worked really well since they are stiff horizontally and allowed me to get secure foot jams with zero foot pain.

One of the things that I also learned this first weekend was that the TC Pros do not break-in easily and after a pitch of climbing I was ready to take them off. On the other hand, the laces allow for a ton of adjustability so I could fit them a bit loosely on easier pitches for less pain. I was able to wear them for two consecutive pitches on the excellent three pitch MegaPlex, but was happy to take them off at the top.

P1040697

Doing an FA on Mount Langley

After Pine Creek I knew that I wanted to take the TC Pro’s crack climbing and the following weekend I got in thirteen full pitches of alpine climbing. On the first day on Mt. Langley I was able to wear the wear the shoes for a five pitch FA, only having to unlaced  them at the pitch three belay.  I was really happy with the lining of the shoes on this climb since my feet stayed quite warm in the TC Pro on the shady North facing route.  Also, the cracks were a bit sharp and the TC Pro’s did a great job of protecting my ankles.

The next day turned out to be an even longer adventure on the Keystone wall where we added a new finish variation to one of the existing lines. Climbing another new five pitches, I found a downside to the high top as small twigs, loose rock  and various other pieces of nature got wedged in my shoe. To be fair, the rock quality wasn’t ideal and I did climb through a few trees so this might be expected in a high top shoe. This day my feet were really starting to break into the shoes, though I still had pain in my little toes and occasionally my right big toe fell asleep.

IMG_1345

Trusting the smears on Spook Book at the Needles

The last three months these shoes  stayed on my feet for almost all my climbing adventures. They worked great in the granite cracks of the Needles and performed on the tricky footwork in Yosemite. As a final test I wore the TC Pro on our onsight attempt of the Freeblast. The shoes worked well standing on the small feet and jamming in many cracks. Our next day we went back for the redpoint and I swapped in my Miuras that I usually wear on multipitch routes.  While the Miuras provied me with added sensitivitiy, mainly due to the thinner sole, I missed the stiffness of the TC Pro. I felt less secure on small edges due to the softer platform of the Miuras. I think this test really drove home the advantage of the stiff shoe.


TC Pro Review - 040

TC Pro’s after climbing El Capitan

I held off publishing this review for a week so I could squeeze in one more test, El Capitan.  This past weekend I made my first multi day attempt on Freerider and brought along the TC Pro’s. The shoes are nicely broken in now, and while I still took them off at some belays, I was not in a rush to do so. These were the only climbing shoes I wore for our three and half days on the route. The shoes continue to perform wonderfully and they helped me have confidence to stand on numerous tiny foot holds including a redpoint of the 5.11+ slab just above Heart ledges that had seemed impossible on a previous attempt. After many pitches of climbing the shoes are in pretty good shape except for the rands on the side of the shoe. As you can see in the photo above both rands a third of the way up the inside of the shoe  have worn through quite a bit. This duribility issue  is the only real  gripe I have with these shoes.  Everyone’s feet are different so your milage may vary.  I have been using these shoes on a multitude of cracks and the wear may be caused by the way I jam my feet or an issue specific to my pair of shoes.

Overall I highly recommend these shoes. They perform amazingly well on granite and are a dream for single and multi-pitch crack climbing.

Smearing:

As I have stated, this shoe is fairly stiff and the rubber is a bit thick in the front. However, contrary to expectations, I think this shoe smears very well. The feel of small divots in the rock may be diminished by thick sole but the TC Pro really sticks to the rock. I was very impressed on Spook Book where I was constantly trusting my feet to featureless granite.  Proving its all around status, yet again, these shoes were instrumental on my first Yosemite 5.12 which featured powerful underclings with minimal feet. The TC Pro stuck to the wall and allowed for powerful opposition as I climbed the sweeping arch of Underclingon.

P1250971

Committed to a layback on Atlantis at the Needles, CA.

Edging:

An afternoon climbing at one of the San Diego local areas made me really understand how the TC Pro’s worked with edges.  So far I had not trusted them on thinner edges since I didn’t have a good feeling of the rock through the thick and  stiff sole. Lets split edges into three categories: a large edge, a small edge and a micro edge. With a large edge you have so much rubber on the feature that you don’t expect to feel it. Here the TC’s work great and stiffness is a plus. On a small edge I am used to being able to feel the edge and how my shoe is sitting on it.  Since the TC Pro’s are so stiff I struggle when I can’t feel where my foot is on an edge. On a micro edge you don’t expect to feel the edge and the stiffness is a plus. Thus the TC Pro excels for micro-edging and I have been impressed with how well it sticks to micro footholds. The micro-edge theory was further confirmed on Stairway to Heaven at Tahquitz where I had to apply all of my weight to some very small holds which great success.  On the opposite edge of the spectrum, I struggled to stand on a small edge on The Flakes since it felt smaller than it really was, due to the lack of sensitivity. Perhaps these are just my own mental distinctions but this is the best way I can explain my experience with the TC Pro.

IMG_2710

A bit of tricky footwork on Pratt’s Crack.

Crack and Offwidth Protection

The semi high top of the TC Pro’s does a great job of protecting your ankles. Prior to climbing Mt. Conness and Pratt’s Crack I had spent a day of offwidthing using the lower-topped Tradmaster. My ankles turned out quite beat up and I was very happy to have the high top protection when climbing the offwidth on the Harding Route. I also found the lengthwise stiffness on the TC Pro works really well for offwidths and squeeze chimneys. I felt very secure doing heel toe jams in 6″ – 10″ cracks and doing tricky foot stacking on Pratt’s Crack. These shoes really work well in cracks of all sizes!

Pros:

  • Stiff sole edge well on very small holds.
  • Horizontal stiffness and toe padding make this shoe a crack climbing all-star.
  • Lining is soft and warm (good for alpine routes).
  • High top provides excellent ankle protection.

Cons:

  • Long break in time.
  • The side rand has durability issues.
  • Thick sole reduces sensitivity.
  • Expensive.

Sizing:

I wear the TC Pro in a size 39.  I wear size 38.5 Miuras and Testarossas (tight)  and size 38 Katanas (tight) & Cobras.

In 5.10 shoes I wear 7.5 Mocasysms (comfy).

Cheers,

Luke

Full Disclosure: La Sportiva provided these shoes to DreamInVertical in exchange for this review. The opinions expressed above are my own and reflect my experience with these shoes.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the TC Pro.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

Its been little over a year now that Lizzy and I have been using our Reverso3′s, Black Diamond C3′s and Oz carabiners. I wanted to check back in and give some follow up comments to add to my first review .

Petzl Reverso 3

Looking back over the past year I’ve done over 300 pitches of climbing which is likely the reason my latest Reverso is looking pretty shabby. Lizzy’s is still going strong and she loves it. I have enjoyed mine and liked that it worked well with ropes of variable diameters and is very light weight for an auto-blocking belay device.

One important thing that I have learned with the Reverso 3 is that the ease of pulling through the rope, in top belay mode, is proportional to the size of the biner that is being used.  After getting my Arc’teryx harness I switched out my belay biners for the Black Diamond VaporLock which I usually use on my daisy chain.  I like this keylock biner since it has a pretty narrow nose, good for clipping through bolts, and weights around 50 grams. However this biner does not work well with the Reverso3 when belaying a second on a 10 mm rope and I often had to add second biner. Some interesting stats can be found at Black Diamond on the use of auto-blocking belay devices.

Climbing - Summer 09 087

The Reverso3 with a nice large round radius Omega locker. Too bad they are WAY heavy…

So when using the Reverso3 I suggest a nice round carabiner like the Petzl Attache or BD Rocklock. I just got the new Attache 3D which is a bit flatter than the Attache but has a bigger radius than the Vaporlock. I am currently using this biner for belaying since it is lighter than the original Attache and about the same as the Vaporlock.

Overall, I really like the Reverso3 and only have a few minor complaints. The Reverso 3 doesn’t top belay as well with ropes fatter than 10 mm. This doesn’t effect me that much I usually use ropes between 9.4 and 9.8 but it is worth mentioning since I have had trouble with partners’ ropes. Secondly, my Reverso3 only lasted a year before the edges became fairly sharp (like previous models) and I no longer felt comfortable using it for belaying. As I said before this is probably reasonable since I used it for so many pitches, especially for rappelling, which causes the most wear.

Black Diamond OZ Carabiners and Quickdraws.

When I first got a hold of the Oz carabiners they went straight to my rack. It is easy to drop a pound or so off your rack by upgrading to these 28 gram carabiners. So far they have done well and have been taken up many pitches, clipped directly and scraped on sharp granite. I do see the shiny coating leaving some of these biners, but that’s to be expected and I see no scary wear from the last year of use.

After my cams lost some weight, I knew that a new set of ultralight quickdraws were in order. Since getting my first round of Oz carabiners I decided to check out some of the other lightweight biners before committing fully. The Camp Nano 23 was first on my list since it is the lightest carabiner available.  A few of my friends use this carabiner and I played with it both on slings and as a racking biner. My main issue with the Nano is the size. My fingers are not that dexterous, so clipping a toy-sized biner in a tricky situation was less than ideal. As a racking biner I found it to be more acceptable but still a bit small for my liking.  A good use for the Nano is for a pre-made anchor setup. I’m thinking about buying a few to create this simple setup used by my friends:

Ultra light belay setup. ~120 grams Photo thanks to Nate at PullHarder

This year Metolius added another 23 gram carabiner to the market with the FS (Full Strength) mini. This carabiner is a bit smaller than the Camp Nano but has a nicer looking finish. Since this is even smaller biner than the Camp I think it would be pretty hard to clip in a time critical situation. I think the Camp Nano and the FS Mini have a place in the alpine realm where weight is essential. Also if you have small fingers or hands these might be a good option.

I got to play with another two lightweight biners on our trip to Indian Creek back in March. One of our friends racks his cams on the Mammut Moses, which clock in at 27 grams. This carabiner is almost as large as the Oz but has a funny feeling since it is quite thin. For some reason this biner, as well as the Trango Superfly, 31 grams, just doesn’t feel right in my hand. A combination of a slick coating and the thin metal design makes me stay away from these biners. Many of my friends swear by the Superfly since it is cheap, almost full size and lightweight. I climbed with the Superfly and the Moses a bit more recently and  got used to the shape which made me like them a bit more but not as much as the Oz.

Incredible Hulk - July 09 226

A lonely Oz quick draw on the 3rd pitch of Positive Vibrations

Also in Indian Creek, I picked up two DMM Phantom quickdraws. At 26 grams a biner these QDs are really light and weigh half as much as a Petzl Spirit draw. These got plenty of use and I liked them although they feel a bit small in my hand. I encountered a moment of truth with the Phantom when I just barely made a clip before pumping out at the anchors of Swedin-Ringle. Getting the clip proved these biners were workable and I was ready to get a few more. However, Lizzy dislikes the small size and that, coupled with the $25 per quickdraw price, kept me from buying a full set.

After all this internal debate I bought a bunch of Oz biners on sale and a handful of 20cm BD dyneema dogbones to make long ultralight draws for trad climbing. I think a long quickdraw is faster than an alpine draw and often having 20cm is enough to alleviate rope drag. Unfortunately these draws were stolen at Smith Rock back in June.  Luckily I found another sale and picked up a new set of 12 cm Ozs from Bouldering.com. These draws went up the Incredible Hulk three times and I am super happy with them. I recently bought a few more 20cm dogbones which I have used to extend my original  DMM 11cm Phantom draws so that I have four long draws to go with my eight shorter OZ draws.

The Oz quickdraws have gotten a lot of use and I am happy to have the variety added by having four longer DMM Phantom draws.  I have gotten used to the lightweight feel of the Oz biners and can clip them with ease. Having quickdraws that only weigh around 60 grams each really helps reduce the weight on longer climbs. They also help you have  a lighter pack for strenuous Sierra aproaches.

Indian Creek - March 09 060

A handful of cams!

Black Diamond C3 Micro Cams

The more I use the Black Diamond C3′s the more I like them. The initial dislike of the stiff springs has changed into a positive attribute. The added force of the springs gives me extra confidence when placing these small cams. As well the narrow head design really allows for the C3′s to be placed where no other cam would fit.  As I said before I don’t like the largest size, the #2 yellow, since it seems to be more prone to walking. I’m sure there are situations where the head width would play in but for the most part I prefer the four lobe yellow Alien or the yellow TCU. I used a friend’s Red, #1 C3 on Positive Vibrations and Darkstar and  found it to be a good alternative to the green alien even though I don’t own one yet.

Over Memorial day weekend in Zion, Lizzy really came to like the C3′s after taking her longest lead fall, 20 feet or more, on to a marginal green 0 C3. She was super happy that the cam held that real life test made her believe in the cams. One of our friends, Sara, also had a great experience with the purple 00 C3.  I think the Green  is also my favorite C3 and it got a lot of use on the SW face of Conness, fitting in one spot that was surely too narrow for any of our other small gear.  Overall these cams are still working great after a year of use and always come along when thin gear is needed.

Feel free to leave any comments or questions

Luke

See the top tab for other Sweet Gear reviews or click here.

© 2010 DreamInVertical Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha