My favorite way to write gear reviews is about stuff that I’m genuinely excited about, regardless of what it is or how I got it. The Montrail Rogue Fly trail running shoes are one of those cases. This is a story of a girl and her shoes. They were not perfect, but they just felt so darn good that she ran in them anyways.

I should start with the caveat that Montrail shoes and my feet get along really well. Everyone’s feet are different, everyone needs something different from their shoes, but if you’re open to experimentation and/or you have a good history with Montrail shoes, you should definitely give the Rogue Flys a try.

Rogue Flys ready to go for an afternoon run at Rancho San Antonio

Rogue Flys ready to go for an afternoon run at Rancho San Antonio

Most of my running is on trails and most of my favorite running is on technical mountain trails. My go-to shoes are the Montrail Mountain Masochist, which are fairly cushioned and supportive. I’ve been curious to try some lighter-weight shoes, but without going “minimalist”. I’m sure that minimalist shoes work great for some people, but my personal strategy is “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” and I have no desire to risk injury to try something I don’t need. But lightweight and minimalist don’t have to be the same thing, and the Rogue Fly is a great example of that.

The Rogue Flys are definitely light (6.6 oz for Women’s size 8). When I put them on the first time, they felt so much lighter than my usual Mountain Masochists that my feet practically levitated off the ground of their own accord. My stride was naturally snappier and faster when I ran in them. I liked them so much that I decided to wear them when I ran a half marathon trail race up and down Mount Diablo, and this is where I discovered a flaw. Ever since a nasty case of ITBS a couple years ago, I’ve been messing with (both intentionally and unintentionally) my downhill stride. I had figured out that over-striding on downhills was causing my IT band to flare up, so I stopped doing that. But, of course, at that point in time I had swung to another extreme and had picked up the tendency to lean too far back and land on my heels while running downhill. There are certainly other issues with this, but the Rogue Flys exacerbated the heel-striking problem because I couldn’t lace them tight enough around my foot to prevent my heel from sliding forward as I landed on it. I always pre-lube my feet, but I developed some not particularly awesome blisters on THE BOTTOMS OF MY HEELS (the Diablo course loses over 3000ft of elevation in less than 7 miles). NOT COOL.

Side-by-side comparison of Rogue Flys, slightly different tongue designs apparent (photos from amazon)

Side-by-side comparison of Rogue Flys, slightly different tongue designs apparent (photos from amazon)

Clearly part of this issue was technique, but even after the initial blisters heeled and I worked on my form (don’t lean back, land midfoot… maybe how I originally ran downhill?), I still had heel friction issues with the original Rogue Flys. It didn’t keep me from wearing them (a testament to how awesome they are), but it did limit me to running shorter distances (say 10 miles or less), since there is inherently less downhill and therefore less opportunity to have heel friction.

I considered just punching an additional lace hole to try to fix the problem, but Montrail actually fixed it for me. They came out with a new color (grey and hot pink… they are awesome) and I bought them, even with the heel issues, because they are just that good, folks. Well, it turns out that they made a small tweak in this new version, moving the loop that you thread the laces through on the tongue further up the tongue and slightly to the outside of the center of the tongue. On my first pair, I had noticed that the tongue seemed to slip to the side a little, but I hadn’t connected the dots between this and my heel slippage problem. However, the new design is MUCH better at keeping the tongue in place, which is, in turn, very good at preventing the heel issue. If you have low volume feet, I’d definitely say you should get the newer grey/pink color, rather than the initial red/yellow. They’re currently not sold as different versions, but they are different in a small but crucial way. They show the models all the same on the Montrail website (with the original lace design), but on the Amazon page, you can see that the the loop is at the 3rd grommet on the red/yellow version, the 4th grommet on the green/grey version, and the 5th grommet on the grey/pink version. It’s definitely odd that Montrail doesn’t say anything about these slightly different versions, but to me, the fact that the loop got moved in each subsequent iteration (the red/yellow was the first color available, then green/grey, then grey/pink) says they were aware of the issue and worked to address it. Why they don’t take credit for it is a mystery to me.

Latest version of the Rogue Fly in PINK!

Latest version of the Rogue Fly in PINK! (Photo from Montrail.com)

Especially with this change, the Rogues are absolutely my go-to shoe for shorter runs. Sadly, I don’t think they’ll start coming with me on long Sierra runs any time soon because they just don’t offer enough protection from technical trails and they’re not super heavily lugged, so wouldn’t provide great traction in particularly gnarly trail conditions. But it is very refreshing to run in a lighter-weight shoe when appropriate and I think it definitely helps me turn up the speed on those shorter runs, which helps me from just plodding through everything at all-day mountain adventure run pace.

RogueFlyPinkSole

The sole of the current pink Rogue Fly. (Photo from RunningWarehouse.com)

And there you have it, a really sweet piece of gear that comes with my stamp of approval. If you had any different (or similar, anyone else with those heel slippage issues?) experiences, please feel free to share in the comments.

DISCLAIMER: I bought these shoes of my own accord and reviewed them because they work great for me.

As I lay in bed I could feel a burning. My muscles, while sore, were not the problem. I fell back asleep. The next morning as I ate breakfast I realized my problem. Touching anything and everything evoked pain from my finger tips.

With the the two weeks spent bouldering in the gym and a finale of skin removal in Joshua Tree I was cooked. Fingers glistening and red, how would I recover for Thanksgiving in Bishop? I’d spent many weekends there in the past but never more than 3-4 days. My skin always failed.

I had to reverse my course and luckily Jason, at Sierra Climbing Salve, had sent over a few magic tins. I had used the Sierra Salve occasionally but now my skin had required immediate help. I dug in!

Over the next week I diligently applied salve at night and continued during Thanksgiving week out in Bishop. While I still lost skin, and often struggled on sharp problems, my skin held up quite well.

Over the Presidents day weekend I returned to Bishop for a a four day bout of bouldering. With no time for rest days I entered skin conservation mode immediately. With the first two days at the Buttermilks my skin was starting to shine red. The second night I woke up with burning tips, I had forgotten to apply the magic salve. A midnight application and another before breakfast put me back into the running. I managed no split tips and four days of excellent climbing.

This experience was very similar to the 6 out of 9 days I spent climbing over Thanksgiving. My fingers survived the sharp rock in Bishop and have even started to thicken up!

The Sierra Salve did a good job keeping my fingers from cracking in the desert air. The texture is slightly greasy at first but it absorbs into your skin within 5-10 minutes.  On the bad nights I would apply more than one coat to insure my fingers would be ready the next morning. The after effect of thick skin is very nice for sharp holds. You may end up with a touch less skin texture, but that’s much better than bleeding from your tips.

In addition to the skin slave I also tested out the Sierra Lip Balm. This was great in the dry Bishop air. I’m more of a fan of lip balm in a stick (like the classic ChapStick) but in a pinch the Sierra Lip Balm works. I had the mint “flavor” which was had a nice bite but not too overwhelming of a flavor.

Overall I would happily recommend Sierra Salve products. The salve helped to both reduce pain at night and helped me conserve skin during lengthy climbing trips.

Cheers,

Luke

 

Full Disclosure: Sierra Climbing Salve provided these products to DreamInVertical in exchange for this review. The opinions expressed above are my own and reflect my experience.  Feel free to leave comments!

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

Many people associate haul bags with aid climbing, Yosemite, and El Capitan. But I think that haul bags are just as useful for free climbers, especially when you are trying to add a bit of comfort or climb closer to your limit. When climbing multi-pitch routes, you are often going for hours at a time and the weight of all of that food and water really adds up. Typically climbers split this up into backpacks but they can become quite heavy. A few extra pounds may make the difference between sending the crux pitch, or following a pitch clean. Having a haul bag (of the right size) can allow a team to bring more stuff (jacket, water, etc.) without causing the follower to suffer. Hauling is especially efficient if you are already planning on bringing a second rope to rappel the route.

Large assortment of Haul Bags

The big variables for choosing a bag are durability and size. At first I tried hauling small back packs that I had but these instantly sprouted holes. Even the Metolius Porta-a-cord, which seems to be designed as a lighter weight haul bag, failed me. After these unsuccessful attempts, I bought a Metolius Zodiac haul pack.

The Zodiac is the smallest “haul pack” that Metolius makes, at 16 liters. At the time I was unsure of what size I would need and found this one at a good price. It has no waist band, which can be annoying, but is super durable and can fit  three Nalgene water bottles and a few jackets. Unlike the rest of the Metolius haul bags, the shoulder straps on the Zodiac  do not store away in the pack and can catch on features when hauling.

The Zodiac haul pack on the Rainbow Wall in Red Rocks

After six months of use, I wanted to be able to bring more stuff and purchased the Metolius Shield. This “pack” is much bigger (31 vs 16 liters) and has a removable waist belt and stowable pack straps. The Shield is a little large to wear when climbing but it fit two pairs of approach shoes in addition to water and jackets. It’s large enough that I even brought it on the El Capitan as a sub-bag. One missing item is a sternum strap which could add some comfort when hiking and climbing.

Rappelling with the Metolius Shield

For big wall and aid climbing I have a Metolius Half Dome, 125 Liters, and the A5 Grade 7 bag, a massive 180 liters. (seen in the first photo) The Half Dome has better suspension (with a sternum strap!) but does not have enough room for more than 2 days on the wall. When I climbed the Salathe we used the A5 as our main bag with more frequently used items and food in the Shield. Hauling two bags gives both climbers a bag to carry on the way down. This worked well enough but the loads were lopsided (31 liters vs 180 liters)… Since then I’ve purchased the Metolius Quarter Dome. This is more reasonable size for a second bag at 69 liters and could be even be paired with the Half Dome instead of using the monstrous A5 bag.

Haul bags a plenty on El Cap Spire

One thing I’ve learned is you almost always want a bigger haul bag. I often bring the Shield instead of the Zodiac on free routes to make packing easier.  This is especially true when at hanging belays or on El Capitan. The one counter point is that it is nearly impossible to get to the bottom of huge bags like Metolius El Cap, Half Dome or the Grade 7 A5 bag. Either way you want to be able to get at food and water easily so you consume enough during the inevitable long days. I find that sorting your gear into mesh bags (with clip in loops) will help you stay organized and prevent you from dropping anything. It would really suck to drop your approach shoes off of El Cap!

Gear Recommendation:

For multipitch free routes like Astroman, The Rostrum, Rainbow Wall, Sheer Lunacy and Moonlight Buttress, I would suggest the Metolius Mescalito, Shield, or Express. For Black Diamond, the Stubby also works (it’s the same size as the Shield). Anything larger would be overkill. These packs will fit your approach shoes in addition to 3-5 liters of water, food and jackets.

 

Tag Lines and Hauling

One of the big down sides of having a haul bag is getting it up the wall.  I’ve had haul bags that weighed as much as me, which made hauling no small chore. For the most part I’ll to talk about hauling on free routes, which is much simpler since complex pulley systems are unnecessary.

Roberto trailing our 5mm haul line on the Rainbow Wall

Since the whole idea of having a haul bag is to climb with less stuff you want to make sure you have the right kind of haul/tag line. For most climbs I use either a 5 or 6mm cord unless I plan on doing a lot of rappelling. The 6mm is compatible with the Petzl Mini-Traxion which is great for hauling loads under 50 pounds.  My 5mm line is 40 meters long which is adequate for many free climbs. I use this with a DMM revolver or just pull up the bag hand over hand. I purchased it based on “half” pitches which are usually 30 or 35 meters.  My 6mm line is a full 60 meters which allows me to haul a bag on longer pitches like the Enduro Corner on Astroman.

When I’m climbing at the Incredible Hulk, I tend to rappel instead of walking off. This is best executed with two 70m ropes and I use a 8.2mm x 70m Petzl Dragonfly. This is a dynamic rope that I sometime use as a double. As a haul line it feeds like butter through the Mini-Traxion and is not too heavy. It is much bulkier than the 5 or 6mm lines and takes up much more room in your pack, so I usually trail it. Anything in the 7.x-8.x mm range will work well as a rappel line. They can usually be found by searching for a Twin or Double rope.

The process of hauling a small bag is fairly simple when it weighs less than 50 pounds. I put the mini-traxion on the anchor (as high as possible), and then pull up the slack through by hand (no ascender required). My usual technique is to have one hand on each side of the mini-traxion so that I’m pulling both up on the weighted side and down on the free side. This works best for lighter loads. The bag can get stuck so I generally haul while the second is climbing. This way your follower can help free the bag. This requires the use of an auto-locking belay device, like an ATC-Guide or Reverso.

One trick that I have found with smaller diameter cord is that it is worthwhile to switch ends after each haul. Thin cords get easily twisted and you don’t want to lose time having to re-flake the rope at each belay. Thus like climbers swapping leads, I flake the line when hauling the pack, and then re-attach the haul bag at the other end. This makes the rope much less likely to snag when the leader is climbing.

For free-climbing with light bags I also tend to add a sling and biner to the haul bag so it is easy to dock it to the anchor. When big wall climbing a munter mule is much better so that you can lower out the bag when you are hauling.

If you are bringing a haul line that is shorter than your rope, you will have situations where you can’t haul the bag. In case of emergency you can use your haul line as a pull cord to allow for longer rappels. This is especially important when climbing big routes, or dealing with fickle weather. Having a second rope can be the difference between getting down safe and calling for a rescue.

Overall I find that climbing without a pack increases my enjoyment on climbs more than the effort required to haul a bag. Logistics and rope management are more important with the additional gear but the small weight difference may help you send that route of your dreams! It is also nice for the leader to haul up the bag and be able to put on a jacket in colder weather.

Time to relax and enjoy the climbing!

- Luke

I like skiing through trees. However I’m not the best skier and often I cannot control my proximity to the trees. Duck under a branch, brush by the trunk – I cut it way too close.  Injury is not really a concern, but the other weekend I side-swiped a branch fairly hard. My first thought was that I must have ripped my jacket. Despite the lightweight shell the Nano Storm was in one piece with only a faint line where I had hit the tree, +1 for durability!

Before I get fully into the Nano Storm Review I need to gush about the Nano-Puff insulation. I’m always after the lightest gear and last summer I got a Nano-Puff pullover. This jacket is super warm, windproof, and packs down very small. This was a staple item during my many trips to the Incredible Hulk, chilly weather in Yosemite, and beyond. It followed me up so many multi-pitches as a shared belay jacket and at least five of my climbing partners over the last year bought one. It’s that good!

For the Nano Storm Jacket, Patagonia took the super light insulation from the Nano-Puff and bonded it to a water-proof hard shell. The Nano Storm uses Patagonia’s proprietary 2.5 layer H2NO. The jacket checks in at 24 ounces which includes a helmet compatible hood and a two way zipper that allows harness access for chilly belays.

Winter activities in California tend to include rock climbing with a side of skiing and not too much wet weather. However on the occasional rainy day I wore the Nano Storm under leaky gutters and splashed through puddles. I danced around like a kid and stayed dry!

Staying warm during a snowy christmas day.

Despite making a very streamlined jacket (no pit zips or powder skirt) the Nano Storm does include a few nice creature comforts. I really appreciate the micro fleece lined “hand-warmer” pockets and the internal mesh pocket. The jacket has one napoleon pocket and one internal zippered pocket (great for snacks). The hood easily fits over both my climbing and skiing helmet and is insulated. The back cinch strap for the hood is positioned a touch high and can dig in to your head if you have the hood on and lean back against a rock (sans helmet).

The Nano Storm is a step up in warmth from the Nano Puff and also much warmer then a Patagonia Down Sweater. It is not a replacement for a puffy jacket like a DAS Parka or North Face Nuptse since those are both warmer and the Nuptse is lighter.

Digging out the truck with the top of a rubbermaid container. 2+ feet of new snow!

I have yet to get wet in the Nano Storm even though the material has started to look “wetted out” after four months of use. A reapplication of DWR may be necessary. The Nano Storm is breathable but is quickly out-paced by high output activities. My biggest complaint with the Nano Storm is the zipper. When I first got it the zipper was very hard to zip. The same was true when I used the two way mode for belaying. I checked out another Nano Storm in the Patagonia store and it zipped without a problem. Perhaps this issue is only on my jacket. I am happy to say that the zipper has loosened up but it is still hard to pull and use for belaying.

I didn’t choose the color for this jacket but would suggest others get a color other than white. The front of the jacket got dirty quickly and the dirt is very obvious on the white background. I am, however, a big fan of the green lining and exterior accents.

Overall I think the Nano Storm is a great cold weather ski jacket that also function as around the town insulated rain wear. As a belay jacket the Nano Storm does not replace the need for a puffy jacket but the waterproof exterior should be ideal for wetter activities like ice climbing (which i don’t do). I found myself often reaching for the Nano Storm since it was nice and warm and could protect me in the case of an unexpected rain shower.

Pros:

  • Great warmth to weight ratio
  • Comfortable cut (easy to move arms while skiing, belaying, etc)
  • Helmet compatible hood (climbing and skiing)
  • Low profile cuffs fit easily under ski gloves
  • Durable shell fabric

Cons:

  • Zipper was hard to use
  • Color (white) got dirty easily

Full Disclosure: Patagonia provided this jacket to DreamInVertical in exchange for this review. The opinions expressed above are based on the experiences of the reviewer.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the Nano Storm Jacket.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

With climbing shoes there seems to be a dichotomy of opinions on fit and performance. It’s impossible to please everyone with such divided desires. Do you want stiffness or sensitivity? Tight shoes or comfort? Crack climbing or Sport? Laces or Velcro? Down-turned or flat? With the addition of the Katana Lace, La Sportiva has rounded out their line of shoes. With the TC Pro, Miura, Miura VS, Katana Velcro, and now the Katana Lace, there are a lot of options to choose from.

I’ve worn the Katana Velcro in the past and enjoyed the stiffness and easy on/easy off for bouldering. I climbed on the occasional route but thought the velcro got in the way when crack climbing and didn’t find any situations where they were an improvement over the Miura.

The Katana Lace out in the wild.

Close-up of Katana Lace tongue and laces.

I have had the Katana Laces for many months now and I really like them for roped climbing (a nice surprise). In many cases I even prefer their stiff sole for trad climbing over the Miura. I wear them in the same size as my Miura which is a half size bigger than my Katana Velcros. Initially the Katana Laces were very tight and took a week or so to break in. I think this is about average and didn’t find myself suffering as much as during the break in process on the TC Pro.

One of the first big differences from the velcro version (besides the laces) is a new tongue.  I really like the design which is a type of neoprene sock similar to the Solution and an improvement over the tongue of the Barracuda. This makes the Katana Lace really comfortable and easy to get on your foot. The laces are fairly flat (which helps for jamming) and offer a wide range of adjustment. They don’t go all the way to the toe (so you can’t tighten the toe box) but  I can easily make them too tight in the middle of the shoe.

La Sportiva has continued the spread of the P3 mid-sole to Katana Lace. This, in addition to a slightly more down-turned toe, makes the Katana Lace more aggressive than the Velcro. I find this shape is ideal for vertical and slightly overhanging climbs. I don’t feel that the Katana Lace smears as well as the Miura or TC Pro. This perhaps is due to the stiffness which removes a certain amount of sensitivity.

Luke delicately sends Ankles Away (Photo by Kai Ewert)

I’ve mainly been climbing in the Katana Lace on basalt (for sport climbing) and trad climbing on granite. On one of my first trips with the Katana Lace last fall to the Needles, I was really impressed how well well they edge and smedged while climbing Ankles Away. This climb is really a slab and the footwork is very important since all of the holds are quite small. The stiffness was great for standing on tiny granite features.

The one thing that I don’t particularly like is the sensitivity of the Katana Lace. I can stand on micro features with proper foot placement but I often can’t feel the edge that I am on. This is a double-edged sword, since you don’t always know what you are standing on, but at the same time your foot doesn’t get tired as quickly. Despite a lack of feeling, I haven’t had any issues popping off foot holds.

While climbing Tips in Yosemite, Lizzy noted her toes were getting pumped while climbing in Miuras. I too could feel the strain but it was dispersed throughout my foot instead of being concentrated on my toes. This climb features a 25+ meter long wide fingers crack with lots of toe jamming. I think this is the ideal size for the Katana Lace.  When climbing cracks with a thin hands section, such as Catchy, I found my toe knuckles getting scrunched in the Katana Lace. For this reason I wouldn’t suggest the Katana Lace as an all-around trad climbing shoe (unless you size it so your toes are totally flat). Good to big sized hand jams (#2 and #3 camalot) presented less problems, pain wise.

 

Lizzy climbs the amazingly splitter, Tips

 

One comparison I have yet to make is to the Katana Lace’s older cousin, the Barracuda. This is a now discontinued shoe that became something of a cult favorite. The Barracuda was the first shoe to add laces to the Katana last. Lizzy and I both have a pair and I really like mine for Indian Creek. I have them in the same size as my Miuras and Katana Laces but they are the loosest fitting of the three. My toes are completely flat and the webbing rubber on the toes make the Barracuda great for jamming. In my opinion the Kantana Lace is not a replacement for the Barracuda.

Overall I have been impressed by how often I turn to the Katana Lace for trad climbing. I expected this to be a sport and bouldering shoe but it has been making the tours around Yosemite including some time spent on El Capitan. While it is not as sensitive for small holds as the Miura or designed for endless jamming like the TC Pro, the Katana Lace holds its own. The stiff toe box reduces foot fatigue and helped me put extra weight on foot holds of all sizes. I even appreciated the stiffness kneebaring at the Jailhouse where I usually prefer to wear Testarossas.

Lizzy’s impression: I got my Katana Laces in the same size as my women’s velcro Katanas, and they were very tight at first. After wearing them a couple times, they are still hard to put on, but they are not painful while climbing. It has been a similar break-in experience to my velcro Katanas. The Katana Laces are actually a little harder to put on initially because the tongue/lace system (which I do love) doesn’t open quite as wide as the tongue/velcro system. I doubt my Katana Laces will ever be loose enough (at least in the size I have) to be comfortable for crack climbing like Luke’s but I’m quite happy with my Miuras and the Katana Laces are a good sport climbing shoe for me. I’m not really sure I like the Katana Lace better than the Miura VS, but I think in general the Miura just fits my foot and style better. Regardless, the Katana Lace is a great addition to my shoe collection, and if you are a Miura/Katana addict like myself, I’m sure you’ll love them, too.

 

Luke mimes out the magic thumb undercling beta for Freerider

 

Pros:

  • Comfortable!
  • Easy on/off for a lace-up
  • Stiff

Cons:

  • Low Sensitivity
  • Down-turned toe is not ideal for smearing

- Luke

Full Disclosure:  Luke and Lizzy were provided with a pair of the Katana Laces in exchange for this review. The opinions expressed above are those of the reviewers and reflect our experience with these shoes.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the Katana Lace.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

The concept of a super fuzzy fleece is not a new one. I have been attracted to them for a while, but until now, I’ve always been disappointed: I’ve had major fit or function issues. Although it isn’t perfect, the Patagonia Hi-Loft R3 (revamped for Fall 2010) is pretty darn awesome. As a functional mid-layer, it performs exactly as I think a high loft fleece should: it is extremely breathable, plus it’s extra fuzzy texture helps trap air and keep me warmer (previous fleeces, in my experience, have not been warm enough despite their fuzziness, or have not been breathable because they were “windproof”). As such, the R3 is not “windproof”, but works basically as well as an insulated jacket (e.g. when layered under a shell) to keep me warm.

Women's Hi-Loft R3 Hoody (image from Patagonia.com)

Once I got my Hi-Loft R3, I basically found myself wearing it all the time, which surprised me because I had previously given up on fleece in favor of down or synthetic insulation. These kept me warm and breathed decently well, although they definitely lacked some ease of movement. The new Hi-Loft R3 fabric is very stretchy, so doesn’t restrict your movement like a denser fleece, or a traditional insulated layer might. The R3 also feels lighter than other fleeces of comparable warmth.

In terms of features, the Hi-Loft R3 is just right. It has what you need (hand-warmer pockets plus one small chest pocket) without excessive doo-dads that you don’t.

The Hi-Loft R3 is a great layer for underneath my DAS Parka.

The Hi-Loft R3 is slightly different in the men’s and women’s versions, and since Luke and I both have one, we’ll both give you a couple thoughts about the characteristics of the Women’s Hoody / Men’s Jacket:

Women’s Hi-Loft R3 Hoody

The Women’s Hi-Loft R3 is a hoody, which I think is great! The hood has a perfect not-too-tight and not-too-baggy fit that allows it to fit comfortably over my head (pony-tail or not) and underneath the hood of a shell, or my DAS Parka. The hood isn’t big enough to fit over my helmet, but I can fit it under (although I’d need to adjust my helmet a little bigger).

Generally, I think the R3 Hoody has a more flattering fit than comparable “monkey fleece”-style jackets (I’ve had similar jackets made by Mountain Hardwear and The North Face) – it is not cut like a box/bag and is long enough in the torso and sleeves (unlike my previous fuzzy fleeces). Patagonia XS (and I assume the entire size range) seems to have been getting larger over the last couple years, which is sad for me, because the R3 Hoody, even in XS, has a little looser fit than I would really like. (This sizing issue in XS also holds true for many other pieces of Patagonia outerwear, including the new R1, the Down Sweater, the Nano Storm, the Micropuff.) A loose fit makes it harder to wear the R3 under my tighter fitting shells, but it does mean I can easily wear it over my Down Sweater Vest.

I wasn’t super excited about the colors that the R3 was offered in for Fall 2010, so I ended up choosing brown (an unusual choice for me, I usually go with bright), and it has been a great choice. It doesn’t end up looking dirty (like some of the lighter color choices might) and is a great color for wearing to school, or to the crag.

Need a matching outfit? The R3 checks in for belay duty!

Men’s Hi-Loft R3 Jacket

The Men’s Jacket lacks the fuzzy hood, but gets an external chest pocket and is offered in an amazing yellow color. Following comments by Luke:

When I first saw the new R3 I wanted it. The yellow screamed out to me and in that over the top kinda way I hope it would be “cool”. When my new fuzzy jacket arrived I wore it all the time. The material is soft to the touch both inside and out.

The first weeks had me wearing it around the town and eventually it made its way into my climbing pack. In the mornings when skateboarding to the train station, I could tell that the R3 breathed well while still keeping me warm.

In California the R3 is perfect for most cool weather situations. Traveling over the holidays the R3 layered well under a jacket to keep me warm during the small blizzard that hit the east coast .

As a climber, the R3 is great for active situations. I would throw it on right after a climb and the fleece would breath out my sweat and keep me dry. For long approaches and alpine climbing I expect the R3 is a bit heavy since it doesn’t offer much more warmth than the Nano Puff. However the fit is much more flattering and the jacket is stretchy and moves with my body.  In the size that I tried (a medium) I appreciated that the R3 was long enough to tuck under my harness. This really helped keep in the warmth and kept it out of the way while climbing.

Check out the differences between mens and womens Hi-Loft R3

Conclusion: the Hi-Loft R3 is a great lightweight, yet warm mid-layer fleece, perfect for the climbing gym, around town, or chilly belays at the crag. The fit may not be perfect for smaller women (like me), but in my experience, this slight negative is more than made up by the great function of the R3. Also, the hood on the Women’s Hoody is awesome.

Full Disclosure:  Lizzy purchased the R3 Hoody first and  Luke was provided a sample by Patagonia for review. The opinions expressed above are those of the reviewers and reflect our experience with these jackets.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the Hi-Loft R3.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

As I was hiking down the talus to the base of Mt. Conness, I was happy my toes were covered. Sanuks are no ordinary sandals. They combine slip-on comfort with toe coverage in a lightweight package.

Early snow below Lucky Streaks

My first pair of Sanuks was the “No Sweat”. I was looking for an easy slip-on and they fit the bill. I later branched out with the Donny and the Nomad. I rotated through these three pairs and they went climbing in many places. However, all of them lacked a few climbing-specific features that would really help out on technical approaches and multi-pitch routes.

The Base Camp, which I’ve been wearing since July 4th, took Sanuk’s slip on comfort and added some great new features. First off the sticky Evolv rubber is a big improvement over the standard Sanuk sole. I wore them on every trip this summer to Tuolumne Meadows and I was even able to climb 5.6 in them on Lembert Dome. (This was more of fun experiment and is not at all the intended purpose of the shoe.)

Flying down the descent from Fairview Dome

While the Base Camp does have a sticky rubber sole, the shoe only has a foam insole and no other significant structure. Your feet get more of a workout and I would avoid hikes longer than 30-45 minutes. This does limit usefulness to certain crags and time spent around the campsite. They are a step up from flip flops, in terms of protection,  and do a good job keeping my feet clean (I wear socks with them). One bonus about the Base Camp is the odor resistant sole. I think these smell the least bad out of all my Sanuks. I’ve put the No Sweat’s and Donny through the washer a few times to help keep them clean.

A lovely day on Lembert Dome

The Base Camp is heavier than the average Sanuk but much lighter (7 ounces)  than any pair of approach shoes I own or even the lightweight 5.10 Daescent (~ 10 ounces). This, coupled with the sticky rubber makes them an excellent shoe to bring on mult-pitches. This is made possible with a new clip in loop on the back of the shoe. The loop easily fits a carabiner and the shoes sit nicely against each other and don’t take up too much room on your harness.

My only complaint  with the Base Camp is that the sole on the started de-laminating. I was able to fix it with some barge cement and I have yet to have this issue reappear in the following months.

Pros:

  • Lightweight and low bulk
  • Comfortable
  • Cool Color!

Cons:

  • Price is high
  • Not enough support for long hikes.

Sizing:
I am usually an 8.5 and went up with my first pair of Sanuks to a size 9. This enabled easy on/off but I would slide around, especially without socks.

The rest of the Sanuks I own are in Size 8.  The Donny is the best fit and the heel is a good height and is sturdy. The Nomad is quite floppy in the back, and the Base Camp sits somewhere in between. The heel cup is rigid enough but slightly shorter than I would like.

Full Disclosure: Sanuk provided these shoes to DreamInVertical in exchange for this review. The opinions expressed above are my own and reflect my experience with these shoes.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the Base Camp or any other Sanuks.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

It was early season at Lover’s Leap. Memorial Day meant snow was still on the ground and the trail contained more water than dirt. While approaching the climbs, I made big strides between slippery granite river rocks. My feet never slipped and I was very impressed with my footwear.

In my opinion, the real place where an “approach” shoe out-performs a typical running shoe is the rubber. Many times hiking in talus or on slabs, there are consequences from a slip. It could go from a big scrape to numerous broken bones. If you read no further, the most important thing about the Boulder X is the RUBBER! La Sportiva knocked this one out of the park and I think these are the stickiest approach shoes I have worn. The toes edge well and the sole pattern is very grippy.

A snowy day at Mt. Rainier

Back in May, Lizzy and I took our Boulder X’s for a hike on Mt. Rainier. There was still a ton of snow and it was rapidly melting in the summer heat. Snow could provide a problem for more ventilated shoes, but the solid leather of the Boulder X prevented our feet from getting wet. On subsequent trips during the last six months I have opted for the Boulder X when nasty weather presented itself. They worked well during wet weekends in Yosemite and trips around Lake Tahoe. In the High Sierra the Boulder X protected my feet when I surfed down a thousand feet of talus from the summit of the Incredible Hulk.  Hiking proved not as comfortable with my super-heavy pack and I think they are better for cragging than backpacking.

Half Dome + Boulder X = Happy

The Boulder X is a mid-height shoe and does not feature the ankle support of a full-height boot. This provides better flexibility and I was able to do climbing moves up to 5.8 in these shoes. The all-leather design and snug-fitting tongue does a good job keeping dirt and rocks out, which is great for bushwacking.  The construction reduces the breathability and causes the Boulder X to be a heavy shoe.  It tips the scales at around 16 ounces for men’s size 42 and 14 ounces for women’s size 38.  Despite the very sturdy sole, I would not recommend these shoes for aid climbing. On my last trip to Yosemite, over the course of two days and eleven pitches of jugging (jumaring), I wore a hole in the front of my left shoe. This was a rookie mistake as a layer or two of duct-tape would have prevented this hole.

Fall in Yosemite with the Boulder X

Over the last 6+ months, the Boulder X has survived a large amount of abuse and are still going strong. They are not the lightest or the most padded underfoot, in my opinion, but they excel on rock and your feet will stick when it counts. I will keep using the Boulder X when the going gets rough and when I need a very grippy approach shoe.

La Sportiva also offers a women’s version of the Boulder X.  Here are some thoughts from Lizzy:

I am super picky when it comes to my approach shoes and the Boulder-X didn’t do it for me when I got them during the summer. While I did notice their extreme stickiness, I was less impressed by their lack of breathability and weight (especially compared to my fantastic and sadly discontinued Montrail CTCs), especially when they were clipped to the back of my harness when multipitching. I also generally prefer the more flexible sole of the CTC for hiking and climbing (the Boulder-X are quite stiff, which hurts my feet, while the softer sole of the CTCs gives me more sensitivity and thus more security when climbing). However, I’ll probably use them more during the winter, because the leather really does keep your feet drier. So I personally like the Boulder-X for some situations, but definitely not for year-round use (but, as I said, I am super picky).

Also here are some thoughts on the Boulder X from our friend Jamie and a comparison with the older La Sportiva Cirque Pro.

The gully descent from Middle Cathedral Rock.

I love the Mythos lacing system of both the Boulder X and the Cirque Pro.  When walking uphill, I’ve never had a shoe transmit so much force force from the back (heel) of the shoe into the ground, even in comparison to high-top hiking boots.  However, the sole of the Boulder X is far superior to the Cirque.  I’ve never had sole be so grippy on granite, especially when wet.  In early Yosemite season my hands had no traction on the wet, polished granite on the gulley decent from of Middle Cathedral. Only my shoes kept me from sliding down into a mini Bergschrund from the last remaining snow patches.  The same weekend, the Boulder X’s came in hand on the “slabs forever” section of Snake Dike.  The tread had enough traction to navigate the unexpected snow field on the descent off of Half Dome (photo below).  They were also comfortable and supportive on the 15 mi of hiking required for the climb. While the Cirques offer the same tight and transmitting lacing system, I found their sole to be not as sticky as the Boulder X’s, on either rock, dirt, or snow.  In fact, the Cirques would be downright frightening on snow.  In my opinion there’s no better all-around approach shoe out there.  I wouldn’t necessarily be psyched to climb in them, but that’s because I don’t want the 30 some odd pairs of shoes in my closet to get lonely.

Disclaimer: I have a shoe problem with over a dozen pairs of functional climbing covering five brands.  I’ve paid for every pair (mostly used) except the Boulder X’s.  As long as Sportiva keeps them the same I will buy another pair of when these blow out.  I’ve finally settled on an approach shoe: The Boulder X.

Jamie encounters lots of snow descending from Half Dome

Pros:

  • Very sticky rubber
  • Good tread pattern
  • Climb and hike well
  • Leather is weather resistant
  • Good price

Cons:

  • Heavy
  • Not very breathable
  • Laces come untied easily
  • Not recommended for jumaring (aid climbing)

Make sure to check out the Colorado perspective on the Boulder X over at SplitterChoss

Full Disclosure: La Sportiva provided these shoes to DreamInVertical in exchange for the reviews. The opinions expressed above are based on the experiences of the reviewers.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the Boulder X.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

Although Luke had already tried several pairs of Sanuks, I was skeptical. I am extremely attached to my Chaco Flips (especially now that I have the Flip Pro). However, I am a girl, and I like shoes, so I was willing to try some Sanuks. I’ve now had a pair of the Laurels for several months (since July) and have tested them in the variety of seasons and, surprisingly, I do often wear them instead of my beloved Flips.

The Sanuk Laurel (image from Sanuk.com)

When I first got my Sanuks, I was impressed with how lightweight they are. Being a girl who usually wears flip flops upwards of 300 days a year, “real” shoes always end up feeling clunky and heavy on the days I actually wear them. I tried out the Sanuks sockless for a few summer days on campus, however, and was not particularly satisfied. My feet were sweating a lot and I longed for the coolness of my Flips.

Then, however, I went to South Africa, where it was winter. I knew I’d want some comfy lightweight shoes for evenings, after a long day in hiking shoes. For these chilly nights when I wanted to be wearing my ski socks, the Sanuks were perfect (flip flops aren’t particularly compatible with sock-wearing). This lead me to my discovery that my Sanuks are much more comfortable paired with socks than with bare feet.

Throughout the fall, I’ve enjoyed having my Sanuks for chillier days on campus (or rainy days) when my feet would probably have been a little chilly in flip flops. I haven’t totally switched them out for my flip flops, because they’re just not for the same weather, but I think it’s ok to have different shoes for different weather days. I also haven’t used my Sanuks as crag shoes (Luke does, though) – I still prefer my flips because my feet get less dirty and I feel I have more control and grip with a sticky rubber flip flop than a floppy Sanuk (especially because the Sanuk heels don’t always stay on).

I suspect that I’ll be wearing my Laurels on plenty of chilly or rainy days this winter (especially with all my awesome SmartWool socks), even if I may not wear them in more technical conditions (ice, snow…). They are a great pair of comfy, lightweight “not shoes” perfect for the California days when it’s a little cold for sandals.

Have you tried Sanuks? Feel free to add your opinion in the comments, especially if you feel there’s any major perks or issues that I’ve missed.

Lizzy

Full Disclosure: Sanuk provided these “not shoes” to DreamInVertical in exchange for this review. The opinions expressed above are my own and reflect my experience with the Laurels.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the Sanuk Laurels (or other similar Sanuks).

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

Having a pack that fits right is a big deal, for me. When my well-loved and well-abused Black Diamond Sphynx 35 (the 2006 model) needed retirement (the bottom is reinforced by multiple layers of duct tape), I was totally psyched to try out all the women’s packs on the market. It was very disappointing to discover that every single women’s pack didn’t fit me. I am not tall (5’5″), but apparently I have a longer torso than the target woman for all these packs. I tried men’s packs, but the ones that fit vertically (usually a medium) had waist belts that were still loose on me, even cinched all the way down. As if it’s not enough that a lot of outdoor-specific clothing doesn’t fit me, now women’s packs don’t either? It was frustrating. An REI employee tried to tell me it wasn’t really a big deal if a daypack didn’t fit that well (“It’s just a daypack, so it’s not like you’ll be carrying that much”). I bet he’s never humped a rope and cams up an Indian Creek approach. It’s a big deal.

Enter the Black Diamond Innova 50 to save the day.

The Innova makes the steep hike up to Sugar Loaf much less unpleasant.

The Innova is not only a cool pack with amazing suspension (more on that below), but it is also a smart women’s pack. I think many outdoor companies struggle with women’s stuff because we come in so many shapes and sizes, so one-size-fits-”all” packs are more like “one-size-fits-a-few”. The Innova addresses this issue by having a vertically-adjustable suspension, as well as multiple sizes of waist belt. This means that for long-torso-ed, small-waist-ed me, I can have a “medium” pack adjusted to the longer end of its range paired with an “XS” waist belt. Even without taking the other awesome features of the Innova into consideration, being able to dial in the perfect fit is amazing.

If you’re not already convinced to try this pack, then read on for more Innova awesome-ness:

The innovations with the pack’s suspension don’t stop with its adjustability. The ergoACTIV suspension moves with you: the waistbelt rotates with your hips and the shoulder straps are connected via a pulley system so they can move with your shoulders. In my experience, this has made my pack feel significantly lighter than it is, because it moves so naturally (as in, I pick up my backpack and think, “wow, that’s heavy”, and then it doesn’t feel so heavy onced it’s strapped on and I’m hiking uphill). If you’re unconvinced, try to find a store where you can try a pack out and have them load it with gear (sandbags or ropes work well) and practice walking up a steep hill or stairs to see how it feels.

The Innova can fit A LOT of stuff, but it also cinches down easily to a more compact size.

Before I got the Innova, I’d known I wanted to upgrade to a bigger pack as my primary crag pack because it’s hard to fit all the necessary equipment for trad climbing, plus a large collection of jackets, into a 35L pack. The Innova’s 50L is more than enough space for me, but the compression straps allow me to adjust the pack into a more compact size when it’s not all the way full. The pack lid floats and is very spacious (we’re talking roll of TP, multiple snacks, rolls of tape, and sandwiches spacious).

The outside of the pack has 2 stretchy waterbottle pockets (stretchy enough that you can still put a waterbottle in there when the pack is full, unlike some less well-designed pockets). There is also an external kangaroo pouch that’s convenient for flip-flop storage, or quickly stuffing in a layer I remove while hiking.

The inside of the pack has a hydration sleeve as well as a strap to clip in a coiled rope. Otherwise it’s pretty minimal in there, which I think is the way it should be.

Another view of the Innova 50 from the BD website.

Now, no pack is perfect. I have two main issues from this pack (although neither issue prevents me from using it all the time). The first issue is durability. The Innova was not designed as a cragging pack, and that is clear from the material. Yes, it is lightweight and awesome. But I also actively avoid butt-sliding with the bottom of this pack. I also wouldn’t want to drag it up a chimney with me, or really bring it on a route at all. Fortunately, most of the climbing areas around here aren’t too rough on a backpack, but if I were to go to the Red Rocks / Mt Charleston area, I would bring a different pack.

The second issue is the little chipmunk that lives in the suspension. Ok, it just sounds like a chipmunk in there. Since the suspension has moving parts, I found that they started getting a little squeaky after a couple months of use. I do think I might be able to grease up whatever is squeaking, but I haven’t put the time into doing it yet. So the downside of the crazy suspension is that it definitely requires a little more upkeep than your standard simple suspension pack. Personally, I think it’s a pretty small sacrifice to make, considering the benefits, but to each their own.

Unpacking the Innova. The waist band is adjustable and separate from the suspension so you can get the perfect fit.

If you’re not a girl (whoa, there are dudes who climb??) or a 50L/60L pack is not what you’re looking for, Black Diamond has other packs with the ergoActiv suspension that you could check out. I haven’t tried any of them, but the suspension is really the standout feature on the Innova that I love, so I suspect that this would translate well to other ergoActiv packs.

Have you tried the Innova (or the men’s Infinity)? Feel free to add your feedback below if you feel like I’ve missed any important details (or problems).

Lizzy

Full Disclosure: Black Diamond provided this backpack to DreamInVertical in exchange for this review. The opinions expressed above are my own and reflect my experience with this backpack.  Feel free to leave comments regarding your opinion of the Innova 50 backpack.

For more Sweet Gear reviews from Luke and Lizzy check out our Gear Reviews page.

In case you’re short on time, here’s the gist of my review here: the Patagonia Women’s Rock Guide Pants are, hands down, the best climbing pants I have ever owned. Period. If you want to know why these are the best climbing pants ever, then read on.

Patagonia Women's Rock Guide Pants (photo from patagonia.com)

I’ve always had a hard time finding good climbing pants. While stretchy yoga-style pants almost always fit me, many non-cotton pocketed climbing pants (i.e. the kind you’d want to wear on a multi-pitch route) are either too big in the smallest size or are shaped pretty differently from me (I have curves, but Mountain Hardwear and Columbia pants often have several inches of extra space in the hips). Of the many brands that make climbing specific clothing, Patagonia makes stuff that fits me best. I have generally been disappointed in the past that they’ve tended to make many awesome climbing pants for dudes and mostly tights/yoga-style pants for women. Women need functional climbing pants too!

Anyways, Patagonia finally came around and made the Women’s Rock Guide Pants. I tried them on a couple times in the store before deciding to buy them because the smallest size, 2, is a little bigger than what I would usually go for. But I decided to go for it because the extra room means I can wear them with long underwear and it’s pretty easy to wear them with a low-profile belt. I haven’t had any issue with them falling off so far and I’ve actually worn them with my long underwear, so I’m satisfied with my sizing decision.

The Rock Guide Pants were awesome for the Matthes Crest.

The Rock Guide Pants bring all the features that I’ve been longing for to a pair of pants that actually fit me. The fabric is lightweight, but still keeps me reasonably warm, even in light wind or cold weather. The pockets are extremely functional for climbing pants. The front pockets are high enough that you can still use them while wearing a harness. There is a zipper pocket on the right thigh that is the perfect topo pocket, which helps make up for the fact that Patagonia removed the pocket from the R1 Pullover. There are also 2 pockets on the back, which I don’t tend to use as much while climbing, but work perfectly well when hiking, chilling, etc. The length of the pants is just right for me, but they are also very easy to roll up, and they actually stay put when you roll them up, unlike a lot of other pants.

I’ve been using my Rock Guide Pants pretty heavily (practically every climbing trip, including our 18-hour day on Clyde Minaret) for the last several months and have had no issues with the durability. I probably wouldn’t use them for an offwidth-thrutching session (that’s what heavy duty cotton pants are for), but in general I’ve spared them no scrape or butt-slide. They also have great flexibility, which is important for someone who high-steps and stems as much as I do.

Beyond all these awesome functional features, the Women’s Rock Guide Pants are actually cute and flattering (on me, at least. All of us ladies are built differently, so I recommend trying these on first before buying). While far from skin-tight, the pants have a fairly slim cut. The side seams curve forward (rather than going straight down), which is flattering and makes me look taller (yay, taller!). For someone who usually has to choose between really unflattering and only somewhat unflattering non-cotton climbing pants, cute climbing pants with pockets are a welcome, awesome surprise.

The Rock Guide pants are great with a pack, which can't be said for yoga-style climbing pants.

My only small gripe with my pants is the color. Mine are the “Retro Khaki”, which is a great color, but it does get dirty pretty quickly. I don’t mind this that much, but some dirt just doesn’t seem to come off in the wash, leaving them always a little grungy looking… mostly I just couldn’t get away with wearing them to school/work (which otherwise I could actually do, since they fit so awesomely). I’d imagine the darker color (Forge Grey) is probably much better with dirt, although if you’re mostly climbing in warm weather (I usually switch to shorts), the lighter color would probably stay cooler.

And finally, I’ve had a couple of dealings with Patagonia Customer Service recently, and they were awesome. They were responsive and friendly, and worked very hard to make me a happy customer. At $79, the Rock Guide Pants are more than I’d usually consider spending on climbing pants, but with customer support like Patagonia has, it’s very worth it.

Have you tried the Rock Guide Pants? Feel free to add your opinion in the comments below!

Lizzy

P.S. If you want to check out more Dream in Vertical gear reviews, check out our Sweet Gear Review page.

© 2013 DreamInVertical Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha